Search
Close this search box.

Reenvisioning Rubrics: A Few Brief Suggestions

Reenvisioning Rubrics
Linda Suskie's Assessing Student Learning documents a wide variety of common assessment errors. They result from the subjective nature of grades in all but the most factual subjects. Many failures point to the need for more objectivity and a better system of accountability, including leniency, generosity, and severity errors; halo, contamination, similar-to-me, and first-impression biases; and that most common of errors, rater drift—that is, the unintentional redefining of scoring criteria as the marker grows tired.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
“When You’re Smiling (The Whole World Smiles with You),” first published in 1928 by Shay, Fischer, and Goodwin,...
I must confess, I’ve always been skeptical about group work. Raised in East Asia, my K–16 education relied...
Computers have made it easier for instructors to use simulations in their teaching. These are usually self-paced and...
I recently met with my summer research students to discuss their project findings. During our check-in, nearly every...
Over the past two decades, there has been an increasing interest among researchers in studying meditation-based interventions with...
Faculty lament that students often use Google searches rather than academic sources for research. But now there are...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.