Search
Close this search box.

Making Multiple-Choice Exams Better

The relatively new Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology journal has a great feature called a “Teacher-Ready Research Review.” The examples I've read so far are well organized, clearly written, full of practical implications, and well referenced. This one on multiple-choice (m/c) tests (mostly the questions on those tests) is no exception. Given our strong reliance on this test type, a regular review of common practices in light of research is warranted.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
My mother was not your typical 1990s Beanie Babies collector. She didn’t care whether the little pellet-filled critters...
As educators, we’re all deeply invested in our students’ learning journeys. We’ve likely all experienced the challenges of...
Students generally come into an online class from a background of face-to-face education, and this background often creates...
A common piece of teaching advice—“Teach them like they are your own children”—takes on new meaning when a...
I am a political science professor. And we are in the middle of a hotly contested presidential election...
Many research studies have underscored the importance of teaching presence in asynchronous online courses, with the benefits including...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.