Search
Close this search box.

Four R’s of Effective Evaluation

Credit: iStock.com/akinbostanci
Credit: iStock.com/akinbostanci
Because so much depends upon the evaluation of a student’s learning and the resulting grade, it is in everyone’s interest to try to make the evaluation system as free from irrelevant errors as possible. Borrowing from the evaluation literature, I propose the four R’s of evaluation—Relevant, Reliable, Recognizable, Realistic—as ways to ensure the quality of our evaluation systems.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
I didn’t always offer full-throated endorsements of audiobooks in my literature courses. Maybe that’s because I’m not really...
If we’re to believe the conversations around higher education’s proverbial water cooler, our students are coming to us...
It’s always disheartening to peek at a student’s notes after class and discover how far they are from...
It happens every time. Months ahead of the event, I sign up to attend a teaching conference and...
In an ever-changing academic environment, instructors are constantly seeking innovative ways to engage our students and prepare them...
While much of academia is focused on how to prevent students from using generative AI (GenAI) in their...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.