Search
Close this search box.

An Intriguing Participation Policy

I was looking at participation policies in a collection of syllabi this week. I wouldn’t give most of them high marks—lots of vague descriptions that don’t functionally define participation and then prescribe instructor assessment at the end of course with little or no mention of criteria. But I’ve voiced my concerns about participation policies previously, so I won’t do again here. Instead, what I would like to share with you is a policy that’s impressive in its specificity and in the intriguing idea it contains.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
Students often underestimate how much study time is required to master course concepts for an exam (Chew, 2014)....
Education once came through the total immersion technique. The apprentice worked with a master within the profession to...
Whether you teach synchronously online or create asynchronous video content for your students, producing professional-looking material has always...
I didn’t always offer full-throated endorsements of audiobooks in my literature courses. Maybe that’s because I’m not really...
If we’re to believe the conversations around higher education’s proverbial water cooler, our students are coming to us...
It’s always disheartening to peek at a student’s notes after class and discover how far they are from...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.